I’ll See Your Selfless and Raise You an Altruistic
When last I blogged, I was venting my ire at Mommybloggers who were discussing how angry the on-line childfree community is. Or, at least the small bits and pieces of the childfree community they happened upon one afternoon.
In my research regarding the video that started this whole thing, I read some of the blog written by one of the Mommybloggers involved in the “momversation” about the childfree. In her blog entry about the video, she refers to “bringing a life into the world and nurturing it” as selfless. Um, no. Sorry. I’m going to have to disagree with that assessment, as did one of her commenters, whereupon the blogger attempted to clarify her claim somewhat by saying that she “wouldn’t get 13 stitches in my yaw-yaw for nothing.
”
The common definition of selfless is “having little or no regard for oneself.” A woman chooses to get pregnant because she desires to be a mother. How is that having little or no regard for oneself? She’s doing exactly what she wants to do and doing it for no one (save her spouse, perhaps) except herself. A woman who chooses to have a child may have to endure some not-so-pleasant side effects (painful labor and childbirth, an episiotomy and the resultant stitches, a cesarean, gestational diabetes, or even death due to something such as eclampsia), but she does so willingly because she knows (or certainly should know) that those are the requirements/possibilities that go with having a child. A child that she chooses to have because she wants to be a mother.
And while I do believe that adoption is certainly a more altruistic method of becoming a parent (providing a loving home to a child in need of one), even that choice involves someone adopting a child because s/he wants to be a parent.
Another problem with this “parents are so selfless” propaganda is that it fuels the “childfree are so selfish” bullshit. Choosing to remain childfree is not selfish and, depending upon the reasons someone chooses the childfree path or what the childfree person does with his/her life, it’s quite possible that the childfree choice is more altruistic than becoming a parent.
Interestingly, in delving into the definition of selflessness and altruism, I stumbled upon The American Heritage Science Dictionary definition for altruism:
Instinctive cooperative behavior that is detrimental or without reproductive benefit to the individual but that contributes to the survival of the group to which the individual belongs. The willingness of a subordinate member of a wolf pack to forgo mating and help care for the dominant pair’s pups is an example of altruistic behavior. While the individual may not reproduce, or may reproduce less often, its behavior helps ensure that a close relative does successfully reproduce, thus passing on a large share of the altruistic individual’s genetic material.
Ha. Kind of funny, no?
If you’re interested in reading the opinions of some other childfree people with regard to the momversation video, check these out when you get a chance:












March 10th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
We have children because we want to have children. If it was because we had the best interest of a child in mind, we’d remain child-free.
I do know some “selfless” parents. But I’ve never heard them describe themselves that way. I’ve never heard them talk about all they’ve given up because they’ve had kids.
Which makes me wonder … If you’re saying you’re selfless because you are a parent, aren’t you saying you realize life would be better had you not had children? That you realize you’ve given something up because you had children? That you’d like to do more but your children are holding you back somehow?
I may not have expressed that as well as I’d have liked … and I don’t have time to tweak it … I’ve got to get a boy to guitar practice.
(DAMMIT! Had I not had children I’d be able to leave better comments. Woe is me! (Actually, the ex has the boys this week — I’m doing guitar-practice duty as a favor to her.))
March 10th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
I can usually count on you and Tom to be two voices of reason from the parent side of the tracks.
Maybe you can sell the boys to some traveling gypsies, thereby allowing you the time to make better/longer/more frequent comments?